Where have I heard that name?
Not to wiki it!
Nor M-bed...(FP1)
7-31-13 FOLLOW UP... and apologies to blogs followed and vice verse us. (FP1) *
* day late and dollar short
[i.e. yes there is a 2nd (FP1)]
Showing posts with label wikileaks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label wikileaks. Show all posts
Tuesday, July 30, 2013
Saturday, December 11, 2010
Not Chuffed
and hopefully not cuffed? Have I crossed the line?
[Not in dissing Obama, I support his general success, and posit counter-intelligence, not necessarily facts, but context from so-called facts. In the case of the Espionage Act, is it a strategy to use it, so that it will be on the table for consideration of: a. repeal, b. Supreme Court action c. Political calculus -- a forum to buck 'em -- if we will?]
[Not in dissing Obama, I support his general success, and posit counter-intelligence, not necessarily facts, but context from so-called facts. In the case of the Espionage Act, is it a strategy to use it, so that it will be on the table for consideration of: a. repeal, b. Supreme Court action c. Political calculus -- a forum to buck 'em -- if we will?]
Wednesday, December 08, 2010
Obama Leaks
Some might say he reeks,
but I say that there is more to the issue than liquids or gases.
Pump out the rhyme. This is just a leed into two points which I cannot tell where they came from.
1. the debt does not matter
2. social security does not matter to the debt
3. GE I did not know I was going to stick with the meta4, but of course both matter. And the underlying points I want to make, which I cannot source particularly is that the President's plan when accepted will establish one and two. In other words, the kind of debt matters(tax cuts v. investments) and an opening of the "lock box" that makes congress accountable for social security regardless of debt. Neither are easy to say, leak of the leeds** or reek of the leads, but taxes do matter to everyone, but so do budget calculations and the big picture whether you are a person, corporation, state or fed/global.
[And please note that I have not really made much of the Wikileaks controversy, as I do not support the methods and reasons for its existence. While we do need to have better journalism and government, I am not sure it will help in the scheme of things. Rupert Murdock as a source of inspiration, now supports my feelings in this area, as well as the reference or links of reasoning to scientific journalism.* While my crack at GE hints at the $marminess of some journalism, I will cover that with this mud. The mud in this case is the subjective skills that are responsibly noted which makes raw leaks only facts not truth. Raw data(information) is not just objective but subjective itself.]
*12-9-10(comma added)Rupert Murdock does not support my feelings, him as an inspiration supports my feelings to the contrary, as well as an erroneous scientific take. And last link brackets (information is not just in the form of numbers, but even they are subject to context and formulas).
** [1-17-12 C-(sic): ledes is the intended spelling in this typo]
but I say that there is more to the issue than liquids or gases.
Pump out the rhyme. This is just a leed into two points which I cannot tell where they came from.
1. the debt does not matter
2. social security does not matter to the debt
3. GE I did not know I was going to stick with the meta4, but of course both matter. And the underlying points I want to make, which I cannot source particularly is that the President's plan when accepted will establish one and two. In other words, the kind of debt matters(tax cuts v. investments) and an opening of the "lock box" that makes congress accountable for social security regardless of debt. Neither are easy to say, leak of the leeds** or reek of the leads, but taxes do matter to everyone, but so do budget calculations and the big picture whether you are a person, corporation, state or fed/global.
[And please note that I have not really made much of the Wikileaks controversy, as I do not support the methods and reasons for its existence. While we do need to have better journalism and government, I am not sure it will help in the scheme of things. Rupert Murdock as a source of inspiration, now supports my feelings in this area, as well as the reference or links of reasoning to scientific journalism.* While my crack at GE hints at the $marminess of some journalism, I will cover that with this mud. The mud in this case is the subjective skills that are responsibly noted which makes raw leaks only facts not truth. Raw data(information) is not just objective but subjective itself.]
*12-9-10(comma added)Rupert Murdock does not support my feelings, him as an inspiration supports my feelings to the contrary, as well as an erroneous scientific take. And last link brackets (information is not just in the form of numbers, but even they are subject to context and formulas).
** [1-17-12 C-(sic): ledes is the intended spelling in this typo]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)